Fast-Track CMS Licence: Build vs Buy in a Post-RFMC World

Table Of Contents

• Understanding Singapore's Fund Management Licensing Evolution

• The Current CMS Licensing Framework

• Strategic Options: Build vs Buy Approach

• Option 1: Building Your Own CMS Infrastructure

• Option 2: The 'Buy' Approach Through Strategic Partnership

• Key Considerations for Decision-Making

• Navigating the Fast-Track Path to CMS Licensing

• Future-Proofing Your Fund Management Business

• Conclusion: Strategic Positioning in Singapore's Fund Management Landscape

Fast-Track CMS Licence: Build vs Buy in a Post-RFMC World

Singapore's fund management landscape has undergone significant transformation in recent years, particularly with the evolution of regulatory frameworks governing fund managers. For wealth management professionals and aspiring fund managers looking to establish or expand their presence in Asia's premier financial hub, understanding the current Capital Markets Services (CMS) licensing requirements has become increasingly crucial—especially in what industry insiders now refer to as the 'post-RFMC world.'

With the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) continually refining its regulatory approach to strengthen Singapore's position as a global wealth management center, fund managers now face a strategic decision: should they build their own licensing infrastructure from the ground up, or pursue a more efficient 'buy' approach through strategic partnerships with established licensed entities?

This article explores both pathways to securing a CMS licence in today's regulatory environment, offering insights for family offices, wealth management professionals, and investment firms seeking to optimize their entry or expansion in Singapore's dynamic financial ecosystem.

Understanding Singapore's Fund Management Licensing Evolution

Singapore's fund management regulatory framework has evolved considerably over the past decade, moving from a relatively straightforward registration system to a more robust licensing regime. The Registered Fund Management Company (RFMC) framework, once a popular entry point for many fund managers, has given way to a more comprehensive regulatory approach focused on stronger investor protection and market integrity.

Industry trends suggest that MAS has strategically elevated standards across the board, creating a more sophisticated ecosystem that balances innovation with prudent oversight. This evolution reflects Singapore's commitment to maintaining its reputation as a premier wealth management hub while addressing global concerns about financial stability and transparency.

For fund management professionals navigating this landscape, understanding these regulatory shifts is not merely an academic exercise but a fundamental business imperative. The current licensing framework demands greater resources, expertise, and commitment—a reality that shapes the strategic decisions firms must make about how to establish or maintain their presence in Singapore.

The Current CMS Licensing Framework

Today's fund management landscape in Singapore centers around the Capital Markets Services (CMS) licence, administered by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This licensing framework applies to companies conducting regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Act, with fund management being one of the most sought-after licence categories.

The CMS licensing regime for fund management is tiered, with distinct categories including:

• Licensed Fund Management Companies (LFMCs): Further categorized into Retail LFMCs and Accredited/Institutional LFMCs, depending on the types of investors they serve

• Venture Capital Fund Managers (VCFMs): A specialized regime for managers investing in unquoted business ventures

Each category comes with specific requirements regarding capital, compliance infrastructure, professional expertise, and operational capabilities. The Accredited/Institutional LFMC category—the classification under which IWC Management operates—caters to sophisticated investors such as accredited investors and institutional investors, including Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals (UHNWIs) and Family Offices.

This regulatory framework creates both opportunities and challenges for fund management professionals. While the higher barriers to entry help maintain market integrity and investor confidence, they also necessitate significant investments in compliance infrastructure, professional expertise, and operational capabilities.

Strategic Options: Build vs Buy Approach

Given the sophistication of Singapore's current regulatory landscape, fund management professionals have two primary strategic options when seeking to operate under a CMS licence: building their own regulatory infrastructure from scratch or leveraging existing licensed platforms through various partnership models.

Option 1: Building Your Own CMS Infrastructure

The 'build' approach involves establishing a fund management company and applying directly to MAS for a CMS licence. This pathway offers maximum autonomy and control but comes with significant considerations:

Advantages: - Complete control over business strategy and investment approach - Direct regulatory relationship with MAS - Potential for building proprietary brand value - Full retention of economics and management fees

Challenges: - Substantial upfront capital requirements - Extended timeline for licence approval (typically 6-12 months) - Need for comprehensive compliance infrastructure - Requirement for qualified professionals with relevant experience - Ongoing regulatory compliance demands and associated costs

The 'build' approach represents a significant commitment of time, capital, and expertise. Market data indicates that successful applicants typically demonstrate substantial investment experience, robust compliance frameworks, and comprehensive business plans that align with MAS's regulatory objectives.

Option 2: The 'Buy' Approach Through Strategic Partnership

Alternatively, the 'buy' approach involves partnering with an existing CMS licence holder to access the Singapore market more rapidly. This model has gained significant traction as regulatory requirements have increased:

Advantages: - Dramatically reduced time-to-market (weeks vs. months/years) - Lower initial capital requirements - Access to established compliance infrastructure - Leverage partner's existing relationships and expertise - Ability to focus on core investment activities rather than regulatory matters

Considerations: - Revenue sharing or platform fees - Less autonomy in certain operational aspects - Dependence on partner's regulatory standing - Need for alignment in business philosophy and practices

This approach has proven particularly attractive for international fund managers seeking to establish an Asia presence, emerging managers launching their first fund, and family offices looking to professionalize their investment activities without building extensive in-house capabilities.

At IWC Management, we've observed increasing interest in this 'buy' approach, as it allows investment professionals to focus on their core competencies while leveraging our established regulatory infrastructure and expertise in the Singapore market.

Key Considerations for Decision-Making

When evaluating the build versus buy approach to CMS licensing, several critical factors should influence your decision:

Time Horizon and Business Urgency

If market timing is critical to your investment strategy or if you need to demonstrate regulated status to investors quickly, the expedited timeline of the 'buy' approach may be compelling. Conversely, if you're planning for the long term and can accommodate a longer setup period, building your own infrastructure might align better with your strategic vision.

Capital Resources and Allocation

The 'build' approach requires significant upfront investment in regulatory capital, compliance infrastructure, and qualified personnel. Industry trends suggest that these initial investments have increased substantially as regulatory requirements have evolved. Firms must honestly assess whether their capital would be better deployed toward investment activities or building regulatory infrastructure.

Core Competencies and Focus

For many investment professionals, their primary value lies in their investment expertise rather than regulatory management. The 'buy' approach allows these professionals to maintain focus on their core competencies while leveraging partners for regulatory and operational support.

Growth Trajectory and Exit Plans

Your anticipated growth trajectory and potential exit plans should also influence your approach. Building your own licensed entity may create greater enterprise value for certain exit strategies, while partnership models might offer more flexibility for others.

Investor Expectations and Perceptions

Investor preferences regarding regulatory structure vary significantly across different investor segments. Understanding your target investors' expectations and perceptions regarding licensing models is crucial to strategic positioning.

Navigating the Fast-Track Path to CMS Licensing

For those seeking an expedited path to operating under a CMS licence framework, several 'fast-track' options have emerged in Singapore's evolving fund management ecosystem:

Platform Partnership Models

Established LFMCs increasingly offer platform solutions that allow investment professionals to operate under their regulatory umbrella. These arrangements typically provide access to compliance infrastructure, fund administration, and operational support while allowing investment professionals to maintain their distinctive investment approach.

Sub-Advisory Relationships

Another approach involves structuring sub-advisory relationships with licensed entities, whereby the investment professional provides investment recommendations or management services while the licensed entity maintains regulatory responsibility.

Strategic Joint Ventures

More comprehensive joint ventures between experienced investment professionals and licensed entities can create mutually beneficial arrangements that leverage complementary strengths while sharing economics.

At IWC Management, we've developed flexible partnership models that accommodate various business objectives and growth trajectories. As an Accredited/Institutional Licensed Fund Management Company, we provide a regulatory platform that allows investment professionals to focus on their core expertise while benefiting from our established infrastructure and experience in navigating Singapore's regulatory landscape.

Future-Proofing Your Fund Management Business

Regardless of which approach you choose, future-proofing your fund management business in Singapore's evolving regulatory landscape requires strategic foresight and adaptability:

Regulatory Evolution Awareness

Stay informed about MAS's regulatory direction and priorities. The regulatory landscape continues to evolve, with increasing emphasis on areas such as technology risk management, environmental sustainability, and investor protection.

Talent Development

Invest in developing talent with both investment expertise and regulatory understanding. The competition for qualified professionals in Singapore's fund management sector has intensified, making talent development a strategic priority.

Technology Integration

Embrace technological solutions for compliance, reporting, and operational efficiency. Advanced regulatory technology (RegTech) solutions can significantly enhance compliance capabilities while reducing operational burdens.

Ecosystem Engagement

Activelyengage with Singapore's financial ecosystem, including government initiatives that support fund managers. For example, as an appointed Enterprise SG (ESG) EntrePass Partner, IWC Management helps facilitate entry for innovative fund managers looking to establish in Singapore.

Strategic Flexibility

Maintain flexibility in your business model to adapt to changing market conditions and regulatory requirements. The most successful fund managers in Singapore demonstrate agility in responding to evolving circumstances while maintaining strategic focus.

By taking a thoughtful approach to these considerations, fund management professionals can position themselves advantageously in Singapore's sophisticated financial ecosystem, regardless of whether they choose the 'build' or 'buy' approach to CMS licensing.

Conclusion: Strategic Positioning in Singapore's Fund Management Landscape

The evolution of Singapore's fund management regulatory framework has created both challenges and opportunities for investment professionals. While the pathways to operating under a CMS licence have become more complex, they have also contributed to Singapore's reputation as a premier wealth management hub characterized by high standards and strong investor protection.

The strategic decision between building your own CMS infrastructure and leveraging existing licensed platforms depends on your specific circumstances, priorities, and long-term objectives. Both approaches offer viable paths to establishing a fund management presence in Singapore, but they differ significantly in terms of timeline, resource requirements, and operational considerations.

As Singapore continues to strengthen its position as a global wealth management center, particularly for Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals and Family Offices, the value of strategic positioning within this ecosystem only increases. Whether through direct licensing or strategic partnerships, establishing a regulated fund management presence in Singapore provides access to the region's growing wealth and investment opportunities.

For investment professionals navigating this landscape, the post-RFMC world presents both challenges and opportunities. The higher barriers to entry have created a more sophisticated ecosystem, but they have also opened doors for innovative partnership models that allow investment talent to flourish within established regulatory frameworks.

At IWC Management, we've witnessed firsthand how strategic approaches to CMS licensing can accelerate business development while ensuring regulatory compliance. As Singapore continues to evolve as a premier wealth management hub, those who carefully evaluate their options and choose the path that best aligns with their strengths, resources, and vision will be best positioned for sustainable success.

Contact Us

Contact us at info@iwcmgmt.com for more information.

---

Note that views and figures as subject to change without notice. IWC Management shall not be held liable for any losses or damages to any parties that may arise due to views, figures and inaccuracies that may arise in the articles. Perusing or reading this article means understanding and acceptance of this condition.