Impact Metrics That Matter: IRIS+ vs GIIN—Side-by-Side Review

newhmteam
Oct 2, 2025
8 min read

Understanding Impact Measurement Systems
IRIS+ System: Core Framework & Methodology
GIIN Approach: Structure & Implementation
Key Differences Between IRIS+ and GIIN
Implementation Considerations for Wealth Managers
Choosing the Right Impact Measurement Framework
Future Trends in Impact Measurement
Conclusion: Strategic Implementation for Maximum Impact

Impact Metrics That Matter: IRIS+ vs GIIN—Side-by-Side Review

In today's investment landscape, measuring social and environmental impact has evolved from a niche concern to a fundamental component of portfolio management. For wealth managers and family offices navigating the complex terrain of impact investing, selecting the appropriate measurement framework can significantly influence investment strategies and outcomes. Two prominent systems stand at the forefront of this field: IRIS+ and the broader GIIN (Global Impact Investing Network) measurement approaches.

This comprehensive review explores how these frameworks compare in practical application, examining their methodologies, strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases. For wealth management professionals seeking to enhance their impact investment capabilities, understanding these measurement systems is no longer optional—it's essential for delivering value in a market increasingly focused on meaningful, measurable impact alongside financial returns.

Understanding Impact Measurement Systems

Impact measurement frameworks provide the foundation for evaluating how investments contribute to social and environmental outcomes beyond financial returns. These systems have evolved substantially as the impact investing sector has matured, moving from rudimentary output tracking to sophisticated impact management approaches.

The development of standardized impact metrics represents a critical advancement in the field. Before these frameworks emerged, impact investors faced significant challenges in comparing performance across portfolios or communicating results to stakeholders in a consistent manner. Standardization has brought greater transparency, accountability, and efficiency to the impact measurement process.

For wealth managers and family offices, implementing robust impact measurement offers several strategic benefits. Industry trends suggest that investors increasingly demand concrete evidence of impact alongside financial performance. Additionally, effective impact measurement enhances decision-making by providing data-driven insights that can guide portfolio construction and engagement strategies.

IRIS+ System: Core Framework & Methodology

IRIS+ represents a comprehensive system designed to help investors measure, manage, and optimize their impact. Developed and managed by the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), IRIS+ builds upon the original IRIS catalog of metrics by providing additional structure and guidance.

Key Components of IRIS+

The IRIS+ system consists of several integrated elements that work together to facilitate impact measurement:

Core Metric Sets: Thematically organized metrics aligned with specific impact objectives and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Impact Categories: Broad classification areas that help investors identify relevant metrics for their specific investment focus.
Evidence Base: Research and best practices that support the selection and application of appropriate metrics.
Practical Guidance: Implementation resources including case studies and practical tools.

IRIS+ emphasizes standardization while maintaining flexibility, allowing investors to select metrics that align with their specific impact goals while still enabling comparison across portfolios and organizations.

IRIS+ Implementation Process

Implementing IRIS+ typically follows a structured process that includes:

Impact Strategy Definition: Clarifying intended impact objectives and theory of change.
Metric Selection: Choosing appropriate metrics from the IRIS+ catalog that align with impact goals.
Data Collection: Establishing processes for gathering relevant impact data from portfolio companies or projects.
Analysis and Reporting: Interpreting results and communicating impact performance to stakeholders.

The framework is designed to be adaptable to various investment approaches and asset classes, making it applicable across diverse portfolio strategies.

GIIN Approach: Structure & Implementation

While IRIS+ is a product of the GIIN, the organization's impact measurement approach extends beyond this specific framework to encompass a broader ecosystem of tools, resources, and methodologies.

GIIN's Holistic Measurement Philosophy

The GIIN advocates for a comprehensive approach to impact measurement that incorporates multiple dimensions:

Impact Measurement & Management (IMM): An integrated process for setting goals, developing strategies, and assessing progress.
Investor Contribution: Evaluating how investors themselves add value beyond the capital they provide.
Market-Level Analysis: Understanding how investments contribute to broader market transformation and systems change.
Alignment with Global Standards: Connecting investment activities with international frameworks such as the SDGs.

This holistic perspective encourages investors to consider impact across multiple levels—from individual enterprises to market systems.

GIIN Resources Beyond IRIS+

The GIIN offers numerous resources to support impact measurement beyond the IRIS+ framework:

Research Publications: Regular reports examining trends, best practices, and emerging approaches in impact measurement.
Case Studies: Real-world examples demonstrating successful implementation of impact measurement strategies.
Investor Tools: Practical instruments designed to facilitate various aspects of impact measurement and management.
Network Activities: Collaborative initiatives that foster knowledge-sharing and innovation in impact measurement practices.

These resources complement IRIS+ by providing context, guidance, and practical support for investors at different stages of their impact measurement journey.

Key Differences Between IRIS+ and GIIN

While IRIS+ is developed by the GIIN, these two approaches have distinct characteristics that may influence which is more appropriate for specific wealth management contexts.

Scope and Focus

IRIS+ operates as a targeted metric system with specific indicators and definitions, while the broader GIIN approach encompasses a more comprehensive philosophy toward impact measurement. This difference in scope influences how each framework might be applied:

IRIS+ excels at providing standardized metrics for specific impact themes.
The broader GIIN approach offers more flexibility for developing customized measurement strategies.

Standardization vs. Customization

One of the fundamental differences between these approaches relates to the balance between standardization and customization:

IRIS+ prioritizes standardization through its catalog of defined metrics, enabling easier comparison across investments.
The broader GIIN approach allows for greater customization while still promoting alignment with industry best practices.

This distinction is particularly relevant for wealth managers working with clients who have unique impact priorities that may not fit neatly into standardized categories.

Resource Requirements

Implementation requirements vary between these approaches:

IRIS+ provides a structured framework that may require less initial development effort but potential limitations in addressing highly specific impact objectives.
The broader GIIN approach might demand more resources to develop customized measurement strategies but offers greater flexibility for unique contexts.

Wealth managers must consider these resource implications when selecting an approach that aligns with their operational capacity and client needs.

Implementation Considerations for Wealth Managers

For wealth management firms and family offices, implementing either IRIS+ or the broader GIIN approach requires careful planning and strategic decision-making.

Integration with Existing Systems

Successful implementation often depends on how well impact measurement can be integrated with existing investment processes:

Technology Infrastructure: Consider how impact data will be collected, stored, and analyzed alongside financial information.
Reporting Systems: Evaluate how impact metrics can be incorporated into client reporting without creating parallel processes.
Team Capabilities: Assess whether current staff have the necessary skills or if additional training or resources are needed.

Client Engagement Strategies

Effective implementation also involves thoughtful client engagement:

Education: Help clients understand the value and limitations of impact measurement.
Expectation Setting: Establish realistic expectations about what can be measured and how quickly results may be visible.
Ongoing Communication: Develop processes for regularly discussing impact performance alongside financial returns.

When properly executed, these engagement strategies can strengthen client relationships and differentiate wealth management services in a competitive market.

Choosing the Right Impact Measurement Framework

Selecting between IRIS+ and the broader GIIN approach should be guided by several key considerations that align with specific wealth management contexts.

Factors Influencing Framework Selection

Wealth managers should evaluate the following factors when choosing an impact measurement approach:

Client Objectives: Consider the specificity and diversity of clients' impact goals. Clients with focused themes may find IRIS+ metrics more directly applicable, while those with complex or unique objectives might benefit from the broader GIIN approach.
Portfolio Composition: Assess how well each framework applies to the asset classes and investment vehicles in client portfolios. Some asset classes have more established impact metrics than others.
Reporting Requirements: Evaluate whether clients need standardized metrics for comparison purposes or prefer customized indicators that precisely match their specific impact intentions.
Resource Availability: Consider the firm's capacity to implement and maintain different measurement approaches, including staff expertise, technology infrastructure, and budget constraints.

Decision-Making Process

A structured decision-making process can help wealth managers select the most appropriate framework:

Assessment: Conduct a thorough evaluation of client needs, internal capabilities, and strategic objectives.
Pilot Testing: Consider implementing both approaches for a subset of investments to compare practical application.
Stakeholder Input: Gather feedback from key stakeholders, including clients, investment teams, and reporting staff.
Phased Implementation: Develop a staged approach that allows for learning and adjustment over time.

This deliberate process helps ensure that the selected framework aligns with both client expectations and operational realities.

Future Trends in Impact Measurement

The landscape of impact measurement continues to evolve, with several emerging trends likely to influence how wealth managers approach this area in the coming years.

Technology and Data Innovation

Advancing technology is transforming impact measurement capabilities:

Automated Data Collection: New tools are emerging that streamline the gathering of impact data from portfolio companies and projects.
AI-Enhanced Analysis: Artificial intelligence applications are beginning to offer deeper insights from impact data.
Blockchain for Verification: Distributed ledger technologies show promise for verifying impact claims with greater transparency.

These technological developments may reduce the implementation burden while increasing the reliability and depth of impact measurement.

Regulatory Developments

The regulatory environment surrounding impact measurement is becoming increasingly important:

Standardization Initiatives: Various jurisdictions are moving toward standardized impact disclosure requirements.
Verification Standards: New frameworks for verifying impact claims are emerging in response to concerns about impact washing.
Cross-Border Considerations: International alignment of impact measurement regulations is becoming more relevant for globally diversified portfolios.

Wealth managers should monitor these regulatory trends closely to ensure their measurement approaches remain compliant and effective.

Convergence of Frameworks

A notable trend is the increasing convergence between different impact measurement frameworks:

Alignment Efforts: Organizations are working to create greater compatibility between various measurement systems.
Comprehensive Platforms: New solutions aim to incorporate multiple frameworks within unified measurement approaches.
Simplified Implementation: Emerging tools seek to reduce the complexity of managing multiple measurement requirements simultaneously.

This convergence may eventually simplify the choice between IRIS+ and other approaches by creating more integrated measurement ecosystems.

Conclusion: Strategic Implementation for Maximum Impact

The choice between IRIS+ and the broader GIIN approach represents more than a technical decision—it reflects a strategic position on how impact should be measured, managed, and communicated. For wealth managers and family offices, this decision carries significant implications for client relationships, operational processes, and ultimately, impact effectiveness.

While IRIS+ offers the advantages of standardization, comparability, and a structured implementation path, the broader GIIN approach provides greater flexibility, customization potential, and room for innovation. In many cases, the optimal solution may involve elements of both, tailored to specific client needs and organizational capabilities.

As impact investing continues to evolve from a niche activity to a mainstream investment approach, sophisticated impact measurement will increasingly become a competitive differentiator for wealth management firms. Those who develop robust capabilities in this area—whether through IRIS+, the broader GIIN approach, or a thoughtfully designed hybrid model—will be better positioned to serve clients seeking both financial returns and meaningful impact.

By taking a strategic, client-centered approach to impact measurement, wealth managers can enhance their value proposition, strengthen client relationships, and contribute more effectively to positive social and environmental outcomes—all while maintaining alignment with fiduciary responsibilities and business objectives.

For wealth managers looking to deepen their impact measurement capabilities, the journey begins with a clear assessment of client needs, internal resources, and strategic priorities. From there, a thoughtful implementation plan can transform impact measurement from a reporting exercise into a powerful tool for investment decision-making and client engagement.

We are an appointed Enterprise SG (ESG) EntrePass Partner

View our Portfolio

The landscape of impact measurement continues to evolve, with frameworks like IRIS+ and the GIIN approach offering wealth managers distinct pathways to quantify and communicate social and environmental outcomes. As impact investing becomes increasingly central to wealth management strategies, particularly for ultra-high-net-worth individuals and family offices seeking alignment between their values and investments, the choice of measurement framework grows in strategic importance.

Both approaches offer valuable perspectives and tools, with IRIS+ providing standardization and comparability, while the broader GIIN methodology offers flexibility and customization. The optimal approach for any wealth management firm will depend on client objectives, portfolio composition, operational capacity, and strategic priorities.

For wealth management firms committed to impact investing, developing robust measurement capabilities represents not merely a technical requirement but a strategic opportunity to enhance client relationships, improve investment decision-making, and differentiate services in an increasingly competitive landscape. As regulatory frameworks evolve and technology advances, the sophistication and efficiency of impact measurement will continue to improve, further strengthening its role in comprehensive wealth management.

Contact Us

Contact us at info@iwcmgmt.com for more information about implementing effective impact measurement frameworks within your wealth management strategy.

Note that views and figures as subject to change without notice. IWC Management shall not be held liable for any losses or damages to any parties that may arise due to views, figures and inaccuracies that may arise in the articles. Perusing or reading this article means understanding and acceptance of this condition.

Table Of Contents

Understanding Impact Measurement Systems

IRIS+ System: Core Framework & Methodology

GIIN Approach: Structure & Implementation

Key Differences Between IRIS+ and GIIN

Implementation Considerations for Wealth Managers

Choosing the Right Impact Measurement Framework

Future Trends in Impact Measurement

Conclusion: Strategic Implementation for Maximum Impact

Impact Metrics That Matter: IRIS+ vs GIIN—Side-by-Side Review

Understanding Impact Measurement Systems

IRIS+ System: Core Framework & Methodology

IRIS+ represents a comprehensive system designed to help investors measure, manage, and optimize their impact. Developed and managed by the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), IRIS+ builds upon the original IRIS catalog of metrics by providing additional structure and guidance.

Key Components of IRIS+

The IRIS+ system consists of several integrated elements that work together to facilitate impact measurement:

Core Metric Sets: Thematically organized metrics aligned with specific impact objectives and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Impact Categories: Broad classification areas that help investors identify relevant metrics for their specific investment focus.

Evidence Base: Research and best practices that support the selection and application of appropriate metrics.

Practical Guidance: Implementation resources including case studies and practical tools.

IRIS+ emphasizes standardization while maintaining flexibility, allowing investors to select metrics that align with their specific impact goals while still enabling comparison across portfolios and organizations.

IRIS+ Implementation Process

Implementing IRIS+ typically follows a structured process that includes:

Impact Strategy Definition: Clarifying intended impact objectives and theory of change.

Metric Selection: Choosing appropriate metrics from the IRIS+ catalog that align with impact goals.

Data Collection: Establishing processes for gathering relevant impact data from portfolio companies or projects.

Analysis and Reporting: Interpreting results and communicating impact performance to stakeholders.

The framework is designed to be adaptable to various investment approaches and asset classes, making it applicable across diverse portfolio strategies.

GIIN Approach: Structure & Implementation

While IRIS+ is a product of the GIIN, the organization's impact measurement approach extends beyond this specific framework to encompass a broader ecosystem of tools, resources, and methodologies.

GIIN's Holistic Measurement Philosophy

The GIIN advocates for a comprehensive approach to impact measurement that incorporates multiple dimensions:

Impact Measurement & Management (IMM): An integrated process for setting goals, developing strategies, and assessing progress.

Investor Contribution: Evaluating how investors themselves add value beyond the capital they provide.

Market-Level Analysis: Understanding how investments contribute to broader market transformation and systems change.

Alignment with Global Standards: Connecting investment activities with international frameworks such as the SDGs.

This holistic perspective encourages investors to consider impact across multiple levels—from individual enterprises to market systems.

GIIN Resources Beyond IRIS+

The GIIN offers numerous resources to support impact measurement beyond the IRIS+ framework:

Research Publications: Regular reports examining trends, best practices, and emerging approaches in impact measurement.

Case Studies: Real-world examples demonstrating successful implementation of impact measurement strategies.

Investor Tools: Practical instruments designed to facilitate various aspects of impact measurement and management.

Network Activities: Collaborative initiatives that foster knowledge-sharing and innovation in impact measurement practices.

These resources complement IRIS+ by providing context, guidance, and practical support for investors at different stages of their impact measurement journey.

Key Differences Between IRIS+ and GIIN

While IRIS+ is developed by the GIIN, these two approaches have distinct characteristics that may influence which is more appropriate for specific wealth management contexts.

Scope and Focus

IRIS+ operates as a targeted metric system with specific indicators and definitions, while the broader GIIN approach encompasses a more comprehensive philosophy toward impact measurement. This difference in scope influences how each framework might be applied:

IRIS+ excels at providing standardized metrics for specific impact themes.

The broader GIIN approach offers more flexibility for developing customized measurement strategies.

Standardization vs. Customization

One of the fundamental differences between these approaches relates to the balance between standardization and customization:

IRIS+ prioritizes standardization through its catalog of defined metrics, enabling easier comparison across investments.

The broader GIIN approach allows for greater customization while still promoting alignment with industry best practices.

This distinction is particularly relevant for wealth managers working with clients who have unique impact priorities that may not fit neatly into standardized categories.

Resource Requirements

Implementation requirements vary between these approaches:

IRIS+ provides a structured framework that may require less initial development effort but potential limitations in addressing highly specific impact objectives.

The broader GIIN approach might demand more resources to develop customized measurement strategies but offers greater flexibility for unique contexts.

Wealth managers must consider these resource implications when selecting an approach that aligns with their operational capacity and client needs.

Implementation Considerations for Wealth Managers

For wealth management firms and family offices, implementing either IRIS+ or the broader GIIN approach requires careful planning and strategic decision-making.

Integration with Existing Systems

Successful implementation often depends on how well impact measurement can be integrated with existing investment processes:

Technology Infrastructure: Consider how impact data will be collected, stored, and analyzed alongside financial information.

Reporting Systems: Evaluate how impact metrics can be incorporated into client reporting without creating parallel processes.

Team Capabilities: Assess whether current staff have the necessary skills or if additional training or resources are needed.

Client Engagement Strategies

Effective implementation also involves thoughtful client engagement:

Education: Help clients understand the value and limitations of impact measurement.

Expectation Setting: Establish realistic expectations about what can be measured and how quickly results may be visible.

Ongoing Communication: Develop processes for regularly discussing impact performance alongside financial returns.

When properly executed, these engagement strategies can strengthen client relationships and differentiate wealth management services in a competitive market.

Choosing the Right Impact Measurement Framework

Selecting between IRIS+ and the broader GIIN approach should be guided by several key considerations that align with specific wealth management contexts.

Factors Influencing Framework Selection

Wealth managers should evaluate the following factors when choosing an impact measurement approach:

Client Objectives: Consider the specificity and diversity of clients' impact goals. Clients with focused themes may find IRIS+ metrics more directly applicable, while those with complex or unique objectives might benefit from the broader GIIN approach.

Portfolio Composition: Assess how well each framework applies to the asset classes and investment vehicles in client portfolios. Some asset classes have more established impact metrics than others.

Reporting Requirements: Evaluate whether clients need standardized metrics for comparison purposes or prefer customized indicators that precisely match their specific impact intentions.

Resource Availability: Consider the firm's capacity to implement and maintain different measurement approaches, including staff expertise, technology infrastructure, and budget constraints.